Idea] Turbofish replacement - language design - Rust Internals

This is not an Pre-RFC yet, I’ll write one when it collects some hype and initial bikesheddings for it. The idea here is a new syntax which does exactly what fn-call-after-turbofish does currently, but fancier. It basically looks like this. mem::size_of(:T); iter.collect(:Vec<_>); make_array(:u8, :64, 0); do_something(:T, :U, a, b); So function call arguments can be started with optional type arguments. Type arguments are started with :, and interpreted in type context. All type arguments mus

Rust Anyhow ? Turbofish :: / HTTP Calls and Errors @ Rust Meetup Linz (Austria)

LoRaWAN Applications in Rust - Blog - Tweede golf

What does #[rustc_box] mean? - compiler - Rust Internals

The lower bar of a hypothetical Rust 2.0 : r/ProgrammingLanguages

What syntax design choices do you love, and what do you hate? : r/ProgrammingLanguages

Rust String replace Examples - Dot Net Perls

Type Annotation in Binding vs Turbofish · Issue #90 · rust-lang/style-team · GitHub

Planet Mozilla

Rust Anyhow ? Turbofish :: / HTTP Calls and Errors @ Rust Meetup Linz (Austria)

Variadic generics design sketch - language design - Rust Internals

Get Started with Rust and MongoDB

Turbo Fish Syntax Explained