RED Vs. Nikon: Case Dismissed - YMCinema - The Technology Behind Filmmaking

Yesterday, California Central District Court released an update regarding the Red.com, LLC v. Nikon Corporation et al lawsuit. In short, the case is dismissed. That means the flagship Nikon Z9 keeps its compressed raw codecs. RED vs. Nikon A reminder — RED Digital Cinema (RED.com) has sued Nikon for the implementation of compressed raw recording capabilities in the Z9 flagship camera. In return, Nikon has denied all of RED’s claims and fought back. As a result, the jury trial was set for January 2024. Yesterday, the California Central District Court published the JOINT MOTION FOR DISMISSAL. The case was dismissed.

Nikon snaps back at lawsuit, suggests RED's compressed Raw patents aren't entirely valid: Digital Photography Review

RED's Lawsuit Against Nikon's Compressed RAW Dismissed - PRONEWS

RED Vs. Nikon: Case Dismissed - YMCinema - The Technology Behind Filmmaking

Nikon is denying RED's accusations and will be fighting the lawsuit - Nikon Rumors

Why Raw video might not be the game-changer you expect: Digital Photography Review

RED vs. Nikon: Jury Trial is Set for January 2024 - YMCinema - The Technology Behind Filmmaking

Atomos and RED announce a royalty based license agreement - Newsshooter

Meet Nicholas Coyle Film scanning technician, filmmaker, and preservationist - SHOUTOUT COLORADO

What DSLR or mirrorless camera can record in ProRes? - Quora

Netflix certifies the Panasonic S1H for productions, making it the smallest (and only stills/video) camera on the list: Digital Photography Review

Ninja V – Atomos Thailand

camera Archives - Neil Oseman

Atomos and RED announce a royalty based license agreement - Newsshooter

Camera Settings Archives - Neil Oseman

RED VS NIKON, CASE DISMISSED, What's Is The Outcome?, What's Next?