Lifestyle Medicine Analysed – Poorly

An article in the British Journal of General Practice published online, on the 29th April 2021, sets out a mixture of support, disdain and implied ineffectiveness of the role that lifestyle medicine[1] has in the restoration and generation of human health. The direct journal response online allows only for 350 words. A fuller response is found below.

Nutrients, Free Full-Text

Benchmarking large language models' performances for myopia care: a comparative analysis of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, and Google Bard - eBioMedicine

Ultra-processed food consumption, cancer risk and cancer mortality: a large-scale prospective analysis within the UK Biobank - eClinicalMedicine

Lifestyle medicine: A pragmatic approach to chronic disease management - Mishkat Shehata, Emma Thurston, 2020

Lifestyle Medicine - The Trauma Recovery Institute

Lifestyle Medicine: A Brief Review of Its Dramatic Impact on Health and Survival

They don't come as pills, but try these 6 underprescribed lifestyle medicines for a better, longer life

Precision Medicine: New Paradigms, Risks and Opportunities - Knowledge at Wharton

Assessing and Mitigating Bias in Medical Artificial Intelligence

Medical specialties and life expectancy: An analysis of doctors' obituaries 1997–2019 - Brayne - 2021 - Lifestyle Medicine - Wiley Online Library

Analysis of the burden and economic impact of digestive diseases and investigation of research gaps and priorities in the field of digestive health in the European Region—White Book 2: Executive summary

Lists of positive and negative characteristics of physicians presented

Bad Pharma: How Drug Companies Mislead by Goldacre, Ben